StephanieF | 2015-04-04 16:39:36 |
Well, it´s the 3rd Bloodmoon today...so it´s slowly time for...to jump over my shadow LOL!
First lol...yes Grim, yes Cooler, of course I was what Jero and Val know already since long time...let me explain a bit please: He was my older brother, Michael his name, he died very early...my family was quite terrible (artic cold!), so...believe it or not, but that´s the truth...he gave me pictures, impressions, feelings to experience and even spoke to me...first I was not open but with time I learned it, especially then here in Forum once...declare me insane np, but imo he is not only an Angel, he is even the real Michael...the current Archangel!
At this point all retards should stop reading´cause this is for people like Filip and Val and so on, people with a certain knowledge already...
I will never fool around with you again, was funny, but as Filip said...I just got shitloadz of Karma, and this even tremendous!
Well, as the "ArchQueen of pure Willpower" I like to level up, but this time it was insane hard, Val can confirm this!
My next post will be a mail to Tendou, if you are fine with that Tendou...very interesting stuff, especially for a genius like Filip...
Wow, I feel good, it´s done, thx Michael, thx Filip, thx even James, the big executor (of my Karma)!
Tendou | 2015-04-04 19:41:21 |
Sorry, but i wont write an e-mail back because it tends not to send it sometimes(for the last one i tried 3 times to work). Btw i really like the guy in the video you sent, i watched most of his videos before and i find mostly rational in every sense. Do you agree with the guy that commented? i am open to any kind of idea about reality and life even if it seems outlandish and first, but so far you only tried to appeal to emotions(which is a logical fallacy) and even if i believe all that you have written down here and there, i still need standalone arguments or something that i can relate to in order to make sense of what you are saying.
Tendou | 2015-04-04 19:46:17 |
Also, we can feel because of our brain, feelings are biochemical reactions our body produces during the interactions with external reality and explainable by science without assuming any supernatural background or guidance.
StephanieF | 2015-04-05 05:36:25 |
we can feel because of our brain, feelings are biochemical reactions
That's the most ridiculous theory I ever heard!!! Have you just slightly evidence for this nonsense? And how you came to this thought, how you experienced or calculated it?? (+2 for your true opinion!)
Ok, you are in, so here we go...in the next post my mail to you... Modified by StephanieF on 2015-04-05 05:39:04 StephanieF | 2015-04-05 05:39:42 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mbnfRImMSASorry, but it's the other way round, science has no evidence at all for their plain ridiculous theories!!! I can simply say you the reality, but you probably will not believe me...that's simple the scientific fact of my B acktravels with others through many lifes...of course it was always the same, but MUCH more hot for me was finally to see 100% clear that Karma is real...I did a B acktravel with my girlfriend, and we finally reached (after some sessions) Paris around 1890...She was Celeste, the greatest whore ever, in this life with a supernoble Bordell for the rich gangsters (mayor and so on...). They had for example dildo-chairs for the girls when eating and Loveswings already (all invented by her if not already in Babylon! xD) and the whole naughty paradise for the rich bastards...sometimes a rich guy even married one of the girls...xD. But most of them did let not know their wifes anything of course... After this unbelievable evil life of her, she got 3 lifes Karma to let her see it from the other side (as the victim), that's the way Karma works always...action < reaction...Yin < Yang and vice versa...so, what happened in her next life was, that a hot Witch married her very wealthy father Hans and poisoned him finally (Was impossible to prove poison in the coffee at that time!) to make party all days and nights then...as Anja (her name in this life) saw the W itch coming downstairs with a hidden but quite obvious big smile then, she ran out of the door...she lived as a vagabond then a terrible life on the edge of material and spiritual poorness...she ended this one day as an adult by hanging up herself in a hotel! :-) So...what was the sense? The sense was to see the same what she has done before (suppressing others with sexual power) now from the other view, namely as the victim now! Well, Karma was not paid off for her so it continued in the next lifes... In my experience it stopps when you fully see your mistake and have become a new one...sadly for this often a lot pain is needed to really understand what the victims have to endure! So Karma is a very long term, it needs many lifes to let you learn all the aspects of evil...an Angel is not born in a night! :-) In case you don't believe me this very own (so also very subjective) reality, 'cause you have never seen or experienced something similar to my B acktravels with others, I have also a plain theoretical refutation of ridiculous science: Science says, we are the brain LOL...well, a brain is 100% matter, and matter can NEVER feel anything! We would function like robots, but we were NEVER just slightly able to feel anything!!! Matter is always plain dead, it cannot feel at all! This wild "theory" of "science" was just made up by some very mighty Demons to mislead mankind and let them give up forever... But of course it has NO evidence at all! It's just an insane ridiculous theory without any proofs at all, and humans even take it LOL, instead of thinking self over it...humans are sadly very ignorant, so they do this nearly always, to take the next best answer without checking it at all... I hope you see now at least a bit how ridiculous "science" is actually in reality...just think self, and don't take all shit...rather believe a friend than a weird "scientist"! Modified by StephanieF on 2015-04-05 12:48:21 Tendou | 2015-04-05 08:51:32 |
You are representing the brain as an object which has no working mechanisms built into but it is an organ instead. That means that it is working as a a part of a biological system and has a function. For your world view to be real at all, you will have to assume that you can control your own feelings and somehow altering the the reality of hunger for example is possible without external input.
You are representing the brain as an object which has no working mechanisms built into but it is an organ instead.That means that it is working as a a part of a biological system and has a function. The brain is an organ which work as biological neural network.
Modified by Sinot on 2015-04-05 09:07:42 StephanieF | 2015-04-05 12:30:49 |
You just quote (from retards you don't even know), not any evidence or experience or own calculations of you! That's more than pathetic, you behave like robots in a matrix when they get the "Syntax error!" xD...you are scared to wake up, you are scared to think for yourself 'cause that would mean to be yourself...
Btw, of course I assume (quote Tendou) nothing, I told you the truth! I just can't show you this, but that's no reason to not believe me, since you have no own theories at all! Modified by StephanieF on 2015-04-05 12:32:01 Sinist | 2015-04-05 14:59:18 |
Looks like someone is obsessed with karma Tendou | 2015-04-05 17:57:13 |
Finally got some useful debates around here didn't we :P.
StephanieF | 2015-04-06 18:23:17 |
Looks like someone is obsessed with karma
Yeah...Angels get it much harder and have therefore to care much more!
For you humans it's not so important (since you are full of sins anyway xD)...but if you want to level-up it will become important for you too of course... Modified by StephanieF on 2015-04-06 18:23:57 Sinist | 2015-04-06 19:01:53 |
... Yeah...Angels get it much harder and have therefore to care much more! For you humans it's not so important (since you are full of sins anyway xD)...but if you want to level-up it will become important for you too of course...
I doubt that, holy 7 is pretty tough. Still inferior to "heretic" Greater bargul though StephanieF | 2015-04-07 06:41:04 |
Someone gave you minus for that, so I fixed it!
Please people, opinion should never be a reason to give a minus!
Yeah lol...once I thought the same...but it's THE trap, I mean the trap of all traps, the super genius move of the Devil, but imo the Devil is also a lie, he does not exist; these was also just made up by the Demons (fallen Angels) to give Evil again more power...everything, all and everything are just lies!!!
But please...I think you want to experience that self LOL...I can tell you that the fire is hot, but to really know it, you have to touch it, no other way!
Karma is nothing more than gathered experience so far...you WILL do the mistake you even have to do to suffer and learn...there's no other way to grow/level-up! Modified by StephanieF on 2015-04-07 06:42:44 Slowpok | 2015-04-09 20:01:07 |
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOCaacO8wus&feature=youtu.be
Tendou | 2015-04-09 20:20:56 |
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOCaacO8wus&feature=youtu.be Must watch for Steph!
StephanieF | 2015-04-09 20:38:04 |
Have seen these nonsense...a bit closer already, but still not more than 4 braincells!
Why you don't believe me (my proof) simply??
Tendou | 2015-04-13 20:29:55 |
Have seen these nonsense...a bit closer already, but still not more than 4 braincells! Why you don't believe me (my proof) simply??
You made several claims Ma'am, So i got a message for you : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14jEhdqa5Z4 Sylvia | 2015-04-16 20:41:11 |
Yes, please show me the evidence of your wild theory Tendou...
Of course you can´t, since all is just a believe (of the newest and craziest religion ever, called Science)!
My evidence was in my 3rd post here, seems you have not read it...
Sinist | 2015-04-16 20:54:15 |
Oh my, let us not start religious holywar here...
CyberneticPony | 2015-04-17 01:26:59 |
Yes, please show me the evidence of your wild theory Tendou... Of course you can´t, since all is just a believe (of the newest and craziest religion ever, called Science)! My evidence was in my 3rd post here, seems you have not read it...
Science is not a religion, it's a methodology. Science has a principle of falsifiability which religion does not. But I agree with Sinist, such topics are better left buried.
StephanieF | 2015-04-17 22:28:22 |
Science has of course not any evidence at all!
Science is only based on believes, nothing more!
CyberneticPony | 2015-04-18 15:12:06 |
Science has of course not any evidence at all! Science is only based on believes, nothing more!
Science is based on the assumption predictive models are better than non-predictive models. But the subdomains of science all spawn from the method of science, and I think the method has a great track record. But of course, if you don't believe in that, you're free to believe in whatever else you think works better for you. Just make sure you keep it out of schools. :-P
Modified by CyberneticPony on 2015-04-18 15:12:15 Tendou | 2015-04-22 19:16:49 |
Yeah, well said CP, I don't believe in science and it is not applicable to the real world in any way, even though i am writing from a computer using a foreign language but it has nothing to do with science lol :DDD. BTW this is not a holy war, holy war happens among religions, and i don't base my knowledge on faith, rather on observation.
Sinist | 2015-04-22 21:15:45 |
I meant "holywar" as extremely heated dispute. Religion is very sensitive matter after all
StephanieF | 2015-05-03 21:02:05 |
But of course, if you don't believe in that, you're free to believe in whatever else you think works better for you. Just make sure you keep it out of schools. :-P
To believe is not my thing, I don't like that at all! Science should never be based on that, just on evidence! So, my evidence I have given (in my 3rd post)...now I want to see your evidence in my topic and not just weird fiction-theories of you without any evidence at all, please! Edited to remove a broken formatting tag. - Wave
Modified by Wavelength on 2015-05-04 11:06:32 StephanieF | 2015-05-03 21:06:14 |
...and i don't base my knowledge on faith, rather on observation.
You are just a believer, no observation at all...all your knowledge, as you call it, is just faith!l
Show me your observations please, can't await it! Modified by StephanieF on 2015-05-03 21:07:00 Tendou | 2015-05-03 21:49:37 |
You try to put me on the same page with you saying that scientific claims and explorations are somehow not facts or based on facts. I have confidence and not belief, there is a difference, I think Matt describes it well here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdSUBdF_8EM monoVamp | 2015-05-04 15:42:05 |
You try to put me on the same page with you saying that scientific claims and explorations are somehow not facts or based on facts.
Then show me a scientific fact please...SHOW IT lol!
We are not on the same page at all...I have evidence delivered here, you just talk all the time lol!
I have confidence and not belief, there is a difference, I think Matt describes it well here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdSUBdF_8EM There is NO difference between confidence (to people you don't know at all) and belief LOL! (You should have rather confidence in me and not a weird stranger who just wanted some money for his fiction-book...) CyberneticPony | 2015-05-04 16:05:53 |
... Then show me a scientific fact please...SHOW IT lol! We are not on the same page at all...I have evidence delivered here, you just talk all the time lol! ... There is NO difference between confidence (to people you don't know at all) and belief LOL! (You should have rather confidence in me and not a weird stranger who just wanted some money for his fiction-book...)
Confidence and belief are pretty much the same in a normal person, but belief is the word used by religious people to justify their really skewed benchmarks, which is why some people try to make a distinction between rational confidence values (probability), and irrational confidence values (religious beliefs). Observations are a subset of evidence, and if you honestly think direct observations are the only way of obtaining evidence, you are just as bad as Ken Ham, and here's a good idea why it's silly to only trust direct observations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LW06dav7KAScience usually deals with a lot of indirect observations due to some systems being so expansive that we cannot see them in action within our own limited lifespans. Regardless, these are observations, they can be seen by anyone that cares to look.
Sinist | 2015-05-04 19:03:58 |
Love scientific approach in this discussion Wavelength | 2015-05-06 13:50:44 |
I can't even pretend to follow the first part of this conversation, but wanted to sound in with my viewpoint on the whole belief/science/religion debate that somehow spawned from it.
I define a belief as something that a person holds to be true about a matter of fact. It is not an opinion (which is something based on a subjective value, such as "Ice cream is good"), nor is is necessary true (a false belief such as "I believe Jay Cutler has thrown the most lifetime Touchdowns" is still a belief). It does not have to be measurable - "Gravity is a force that works on two objects", "The Empire State Building is over 100 feet high", "The Empire State Building is located in Wisconsin", "An omnibenevolent God exists", "No God exists", , and "If I dream about the moon tonight, I will be wearing blue in my dream" are all beliefs. The underlying facts have different levels of measurability, consensus, or feasbility, which makes the belief about the Empire State Building's height a more actionable and reliable belief than the one about its location or the hypothetical statement about one's future dream.
(I'm not going to get into a definition of faith. I've heard it defined as "belief without reason", but I hate that definition. Every belief has a reason behind it, even if it's a delusional one.)
You can come to a belief about anything, including God and many other religious matters, using your own observations as evidence and your own logical constructions as a way to put them together. You may come to the right one, but as long as other people hold contrary beliefs, it means that those observations and constructions aren't obvious facts. That's where I think that open discussion about why you believe in God or believe in no God is so useful and productive. Even beliefs that cannot be established with hard facts or measured (such as what you'll be wearing if you dream about the moon tonight, or whether an imperceptable God exists) can be judged, to some extent, based on the quality of the observations and constructions behind them. Science specifically deals with things that are measurable, so if you can accept that God (as He is generally thought of) is not currently measurable, then you should be open to beliefs people have that God exists, at least until you can
(An example of a logical construction, as I define it, is a "rule" that takes a series of true facts or beliefs that are assumed true and synthesizes them into another true, factual statement. For example, I might take
the facts "A and B are in similar fitness", "A is running", and "B is
walking", and concluding that "A is moving faster than B". There are places this won't hold, such as the case where A is on a treadmill, but in general this is a pretty solid logical construction.)
We get some really bad logical constructions sometimes, though. Sometimes people might take the belief "God exists" and the observation "the Bible says God created the world in six days", and a few other minor beliefs/observations, and construct that into "man did not evolve from a different species". It's pretty easy to pick apart this argument by pointing to numerous counterexamples where the construction used does not hold. Similarly, I've seen people basically construct "Socialists like subsidized healthcare" and "Barack Obama expanded subsidized healthcare" into "Barack Obama is a socialist", which is an extremely bad construction.
In general, I think you end up with poor constructions when you try to create ones that take beliefs/observations from science and construct synthesize them into something that answers a religious question, or vice versa. They're as dissimilar as sports and art, or math and etymology. One might be a useful tool in understanding or creating the other, but the two are neither one-and-the-same nor opposing forces.
Personally, I have a strong belief in God, and my own (less strong) beliefs about how He works and what He has done for our world. These drive my appreciation for Him and my desire to live in a way that I believe He wants me to, based on what I have observed both in religious discourse and in the rest of our world. Other people aren't going to have the same beliefs that I do (and in fact, a small majority of my friends are pretty hardcore athiests... I'm an athiest magnet!), and I like to discuss and examine the observations and constructions that we use to get there. Sometimes we introduce each other to new information or sharpen each others' ability to make constructions.
But for me to treat them in a way that suggests that their beliefs are lunacy, just because they came to a different one? In a subject where our assertions have limited measurability and limited consensus? That would be extremely pigheaded and stupid of me.
Tendou | 2015-05-06 14:27:33 |
Some clarifications here and there and i am not sure you misunderstood them Jason but i'd like to point them out either way. First of all atheists are not having any sort of position or claim which they have to defend, being an atheist doen't mean you are claiming there is no God, it just simply means that you are not satisfied with the evidence presented to you about the claims of religion. BTW i really love that you point out that facts are things which are separate from individual opinion and there is a consensus among people about their truth value. And that is where the problem comes for christianity for example which right now has 45 00 denominations and there are some core principles they can't agree on. So I just don't want you to take hardly backed up evidence based facts and try to present them as personal opinon and world view as Stephanie did. At this occassion let me grab the opportunity and ask you the question: what reason do you have to believe in God(seriously, and honestly interested)? And I am not asking for evidence necessarily, just your take on why it is rational to believe any supernatural claim?
CyberneticPony | 2015-05-10 11:23:16 |
Some clarifications here and there and i am not sure you misunderstood them Jason but i'd like to point them out either way. First of all atheists are not having any sort of position or claim which they have to defend, being an atheist doen't mean you are claiming there is no God, it just simply means that you are not satisfied with the evidence presented to you about the claims of religion. BTW i really love that you point out that facts are things which are separate from individual opinion and there is a consensus among people about their truth value. And that is where the problem comes for christianity for example which right now has 45 00 denominations and there are some core principles they can't agree on. So I just don't want you to take hardly backed up evidence based facts and try to present them as personal opinon and world view as Stephanie did. At this occassion let me grab the opportunity and ask you the question: what reason do you have to believe in God(seriously, and honestly interested)? And I am not asking for evidence necessarily, just your take on why it is rational to believe any supernatural claim? I think you mixed up "personal opinion" and "evidence based facts" in that sentence. I have a long post to make in response to a few things said in this thread, but I just don't have time at the moment. Maybe I'll get it done next week.
srbhkshk | 2015-05-12 19:16:14 |
I think It doesn't have to be science vs Religion as people often point it out to be, they can co-exist together, but of course if there was to be some matter in which science and religion held conflicting views then I don't think there can be any real reason for siding with religion. ( I'm not even sure how my comment relates to the discussion here, but just my 2 cents.)
Tendou | 2015-05-12 20:13:27 |
I think It doesn't have to be science vs Religion as people often point it out to be, they can co-exist together, but of course if there was to be some matter in which science and religion held conflicting views then I don't think there can be any real reason for siding with religion.( I'm not even sure how my comment relates to the discussion here, but just my 2 cents.)
I think it does, and i may agree, but difference is i think is that there are too many conflicts to justify religion or supernatural claims.
StephanieF | 2015-05-13 02:55:58 |
Confidence and belief are pretty much the same in a normal person, but belief is the word used by religious people to justify their really skewed benchmarks
Please let religion out of my topic! I'm not interested in religions at all in this context, just want to hear more about the religion called Science... StephanieF | 2015-05-13 03:12:49 |
I think It doesn't have to be science vs Religion as people often point it out to be, they can co-exist together, but of course if there was to be some matter in which science and religion held conflicting views then I don't think there can be any real reason for siding with religion.
Most intelligent post so far from you guys...Religion on its highest is Science, and Science has to admit too much theory-gaps nowadays to be just Science anymore...now that we know that the Big-Bang-theory of Einstein is nonsense (proven also by a german scientist) and that there was something before this, the scientists can't hide these anymore, that there is something unexplainable out there... Modified by StephanieF on 2015-05-13 03:37:25 StephanieF | 2015-05-13 03:20:52 |
I think it does, and i may agree, but difference is i think is that there are too many conflicts to justify religion or supernatural claims.
Yeah, let's keep religion out of this topic, except one: Science
I still wait for your evidence lol...c'mon, show it, you sound so experienced and not just like a believer...what have you seen to be so sure? Tell me please! Modified by StephanieF on 2015-05-13 03:28:53 StephanieF | 2015-05-13 03:28:35 |
I can't even pretend to follow the first part of this conversation...
In my 3rd post (read it!) I gave (a of course subjective, but actually very objective if you have confidence in me) evidence that we (you and I) are...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9oI8IcVv80
CyberneticPony | 2015-05-14 14:48:34 |
... Yeah, let's keep religion out of this topic, except one: Science I still wait for your evidence lol...c'mon, show it, you sound so experienced and not just like a believer...what have you seen to be so sure? Tell me please!
I think you're either insane, or deliberately creating strawmen. Science is not a religion, it's a methodology. Modified by CyberneticPony on 2015-05-14 14:48:44 CyberneticPony | 2015-05-14 14:52:42 |
... Most intelligent post so far from you guys...Religion on its highest is Science, and Science has to admit too much theory-gaps nowadays to be just Science anymore...now that we know that the Big-Bang-theory of Einstein is nonsense (proven also by a german scientist) and that there was something before this, the scientists can't hide these anymore, that there is something unexplainable out there...
The Big Bang Theory was proposed by George Lemaitre, not Einstein. The Big Bang theory's evidence lies in direct observations; the expansion of the universe as demonstrated by red shift. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RedshiftAt this point, I'm convinced you're deliberately ignorant. Also, rational scientists don't claim unexplainable things do not exist; just that dealing with unexplainable things is a waste of time because you cannot explain them, meaning you cannot derive useful information from them. If something can be used, by definition it is also explainable to some degree, even if not completely explainable. Modified by CyberneticPony on 2015-05-14 16:35:13 Sylvia | 2015-05-25 15:57:28 |
I think you're either insane, or deliberately creating strawmen. Science is not a religion, it's a methodology. Kid...it's just paid propaganda to fill your mind with shit (false data)...if you simple take it without checking it for, if it could be true lol, then you are truly pathetic!!!
The Big Bang Theory was proposed by George Lemaitre, not Einstein. The Big Bang theory's evidence lies in direct observations; the expansion of the universe as demonstrated by red shift. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift That's very, very old and by far not up-to-date...all scientists know already that this was also just a ridiculous hoax of course! They have found out that all what happens permanently is that the universe spreads out and masses in cycles...that caused the ridiculous Big-Bang-Theory, but at that point the universe was just on it's smallest...also each kid can easily see that nothing can never create something...
At this point, I'm convinced you're deliberately ignorant... You truly are, since you still play your cassette like a brainwashed robot lol! Sylvia | 2015-05-25 16:04:29 |
You come up with a big theory but have no evidence at all, you really disappoint me, kids!
I awaited at least some true discussions and actually some real-happened own experiences from you on this topic, but nothing...so, that was very pathetic what you showed here!
CyberneticPony | 2015-05-26 11:43:32 |
... Kid...it's just paid propaganda to fill your mind with shit (false data)...if you simple take it without checking it for, if it could be true lol, then you are truly pathetic!!!
... That's very, very old and by far not up-to-date...all scientists know already that this was also just a ridiculous hoax of course! They have found out that all what happens permanently is that the universe spreads out and masses in cycles...that caused the ridiculous Big-Bang-Theory, but at that point the universe was just on it's smallest...also each kid can easily see that nothing can never create something...... You truly are, since you still play your cassette like a brainwashed robot lol!
Point 1. If that were true, then the data would not be reproducible, and since most of this data is easily reproducible, you only need a telescope, you're just being a conspiracy theorist, and a bad one at that. Point 2. That's a really dumb thing to say. Nobody claims that something came from nothing at the Big Bang. I mean, I gave you the concept of red shift to go and learn about it because it is probably the easiest to explain for a complete dummy (and I really cannot find a better word, you seem to have no knowledge on the subject), but we actually know MORE than just the position and singular nature of the creation of the universe, we also know that the time we experience also began at that instant, meaning "what happened before the big bang?" question actually has an answer: "undefined" (aka, it's a badly formed question, the linear time we experience did not exist before it). http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.htmlIf you're still going to ask "what happened before time began", then you're officially broken, that question is illogical. If you want to ask "where did the singularity come from", the answer is "it is simply the initial state of the universe, and how the initial state was set is unknown." If you want to believe a God created it or whatever, that's fine, but that is meaningless since you really don't know and are just guessing. Point 3. It's not a cassette, I can prove everything I say, and I've done many experiments for myself, whether it was for fun or part of school, you just talk about made up nonsense that only the most arrogant uncritical person could possibly believe. Robots cannot be brainwashed, they don't have brains. I'd even go further to say my entire rationale for thought lies in the Bayes Theorem. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes%27_theoremHonestly though, since it seems you are constantly strawmanning ("Science is a religion"), fabricating ("all scientists know already that this was also just a ridiculous hoax"), ad homineming ("Kid... it's just paid propaganda ... you are truly pathetic"), I doubt this conversation will go anywhere, not only are you choose to be willfully ignorant of the very thing that brought you much of the technology you use today, but the way you treat people is basically despicable and you should be ashamed of yourself. But if you even had a concept of shame, you probably wouldn't be spouting this hyper-zealous fanaticism. Tendou | 2015-05-26 11:54:59 |
You come up with a big theory but have no evidence at all, you really disappoint me, kids! I awaited at least some true discussions and actually some real-happened own experiences from you on this topic, but nothing...so, that was very pathetic what you showed here!
Science is the best method in understanding reality and if you are having so much trouble with accepting evidence then i would be really interested in how can you differentiate between what is real and what is false?
Sinist | 2015-05-26 13:53:27 |
Are endless lols supposed to conceal offensive posts?
monoVamp | 2015-05-28 00:05:38 |
just false data ...or data without any (personal) evidence or (personal) background...
I'm always offensive (in the german sense of being not passive) against people without (own) minds...and I'm very proud of it of course...and I love the minusses, to let them confirm that they are just childish idiots without any respect...
Let me please add, that I liked the posts of Wave and srbhkshk very much, even though it had not really to do with the topic...this was never a topic about religion, just if you see science as a religion...in the propagandic form as it is presented today, science reaches not the status of a religion, just the minor status of a dangerous cult!
... Science is the best method in understanding reality and if you are having so much trouble with accepting evidence then i would be really interested in how can you differentiate between what is real and what is false?
Yes Tendou, tell me what in your totally brainwashed mind is real and what false lol...and btw, you still come not up with evidence, just with empty words of "evidence" LOL all the time...
For me is real what I have observed myself, and theories that are contradictionary to my observation are of course false...these method is called Science!!! Modified by monoVamp on 2015-05-28 00:13:30 CyberneticPony | 2015-05-28 00:41:12 |
just false data ...or data without any (personal) evidence or (personal) background... I'm always offensive (in the german sense of being not passive) against people without (own) minds...and I'm very proud of it of course...and I love the minusses, to let them confirm that they are just childish idiots without any respect... Let me please add, that I liked the posts of Wave and srbhkshk very much, even though it had not really to do with the topic...this was never a topic about religion, just if you see science as a religion...in the propagandic form as it is presented today, science reaches not the status of a religion, just the minor status of a dangerous cult! ... Yes Tendou, tell me what in your totally brainwashed mind is real and what false lol...and btw, you still come not up with evidence, just with empty words of "evidence" LOL all the time... For me is real what I have observed myself, and theories that are contradictionary to my observation are of course false...these method is called Science!!!
So basically, anyone who disagrees with you is "mindless". People who think like that tend to be extremists. The fact that you don't understand this evidence is personal because it's reproducible is pretty funny actually.
StephanieF | 2015-05-31 05:27:58 |
You have no evidence, you just bluff with a complete empty hand!
If you mean the producing of a new body, what has it to do with the Spirit? We just take a body to go on in our Karma, but when the Karma is completed, there is no need for this quite pathetic toy anymore...
But your funny joke is even very true (Take my +2 for this lucky shot.), we Angels have never Sex (simply not the appropriate pleasure, too boring)...
Mindless is for me just a sleeping person who prefers to sleep forever LOL and don't even think, that my evidence maybe could be true...a so called extremist (yeah)!
I think, the true reason behind this is endless fear (to open the eyes just a tiny little bit)!
To disagree is np at all as long as you give your experience and thoughts, but to quote ridiculous, pathetic and paid theories (that have no evidence at all) and nothing at all from yourself (not even a thought) just insults me completely (like you would refuse a communication)! Modified by StephanieF on 2015-05-31 05:34:50 Drizzle | 2015-05-31 23:49:39 |
I thought you might want to know we found a humanoid remains from millions of years ago, it was on a news site. so yeah we may have another middle decendant in the line. i'd like to see how far back humans go JoeChen | 2015-05-31 23:55:08 |
Ha ...so science is still the best method for you Tendou??
Your card-house becomes smaller lol...
Science is of course the even only method, but just if it is Science and not just propaganda for the mindless masses!!!
What does mankind know?! Nothing Modified by JoeChen on 2015-06-01 00:10:56 CyberneticPony | 2015-06-02 22:54:18 |
What does mankind know?! Nothing
The Socratic paradox; you'd not be able to make that statement if mankind literally knew nothing. If of course, you're just being "metaphorical", here's a disproof of the impossibility for mankind to ascertain knowledge. A person is capable of stating "I am not a being with omniscience". If the person is telling the truth, they have made a statement of knowledge. If the person is lying, that makes them omniscient, and hence know everything, which also means they have knowledge. This simple paradox is all that's required to deduce that mankind has knowledge. There are many other such examples, this is just one of my favourites. You have no evidence, you just bluff with a complete empty hand! If you mean the producing of a new body, what has it to do with the Spirit? We just take a body to go on in our Karma, but when the Karma is completed, there is no need for this quite pathetic toy anymore... But your funny joke is even very true (Take my +2 for this lucky shot.), we Angels have never Sex (simply not the appropriate pleasure, too boring)... Mindless is for me just a sleeping person who prefers to sleep forever LOL and don't even think, that my evidence maybe could be true...a so called extremist (yeah)! I think, the true reason behind this is endless fear (to open the eyes just a tiny little bit)! To disagree is np at all as long as you give your experience and thoughts, but to quote ridiculous, pathetic and paid theories (that have no evidence at all) and nothing at all from yourself (not even a thought) just insults me completely (like you would refuse a communication)!
I do not believe there is such thing as a spirit, I do not believe there is a karmic mechanism in the universe. I do not believe angels exist. The evidence is literally on the opposite end of a telescope. You have been told what to look for even, you just refuse to. It's like someone being told "hey, your post is in the post office" and refusing to walk inside.
I think you've past the point where I can treat you with any sort of respect, so the conversation is over. I seriously gave it my best shot, but you've constantly attacked, misrepresented and played the contrarian to everything and anything I have said. I don't think you want to have a discussion, just propagate zealotry.
Even if angels and demons existed, I think you're more of a demon than an angel.
Modified by CyberneticPony on 2015-06-03 01:21:06 StephanieF | 2015-06-05 07:18:42 |
I think you've past the point where I can treat you with any sort of respect, so the conversation is over.
OMG, thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanks so much, this dude was soooooooooooooooooooooooo mindless!
Even if angels and demons existed, I think you're more of a demon than an angel.
For you E8 for sure, I swear! I have nothing against you, but even one of my friends said "Why are you discussing with these kids?!"...I still wonder how someone can be sooo...let's call it naive lol
I give you a final +2, 'cause you promised to leave this topic (after having ruined it)...I will recreate it anyway for intelligent people (tooo important!) Modified by StephanieF on 2015-06-05 07:20:09 |